#1 2008-10-26 02:42:27

  • Registered: 2008-10-26
  • Posts: 1

Topic: Ruth's Presentation in Waterloo - Conrad Grebel - 25 October 2008

My daughter Erinn and I attended the presentation by Ruth tonight at Conrad Grebel.  Erinn was homeschooled and did much of her grade 11 studies on the phenomena of the Gulag system.  She enjoyed the presentation immensely.  The one thing that both my daughter and agreed to disagree on, was the statement made by Ruth concerning the symbol of the Red Star, and her confrontation with her son when he brought one home.  During the question period, a gentle raised his own objection, that the star represented the idealism of Marxist ideology and not the reign of Stalin in Russia. 

Both my daughter and I could not agree more.  Not only this, but to compare the star to the swastika is a manipulative and emotive methodology that squashes anyone being able to dialog freely and openly about both the Nazi and the Soviet eras.  We must defend free thought and free speech even of those who are holding to repugnant ideology.  We cannot and should not outlaw the symbols themselves, nor the free speech and interchange of idea concerning what they represent.  This is why it is evil to see what is done in Germany and Austria concerning discussions of the Nazi era and its crimes.  The only way to confront the Holocaust deniers, and the deniers of the evils of the Soviet regime, is to encourage and embrace the exchange of ideas and opinions.  This was the only dissent you had out of an otherwise very good presentation.

One other note, the Gulags did not disappear in the 1950s.  They were used until 1989, until shortly before the fall of the Berlin Wall.  Kruschev and Breshnev sent millions to the camps as well.  They were the most horrific during Stalin.  At the same time as the five year plan in the early 1930s, Stalin also purged the military, that by 1937-38, the Soviet general staff was so compromised that it offered next to no resistance and very poor leadership in the Soviet military as it tried to hold the Nazis at bay in 1941, 1942 and early 1943.  His own purges of the 1930's cost the Soviets dearly in WWII.

Thanks again for a great evening.

Sam & Erinn Buick
Waterloo

#2 2008-10-30 03:52:05

  • red
  • New member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2008-08-08
  • Posts: 8

Re: Re: Ruth's Presentation in Waterloo - Conrad Grebel - 25 October 2008

Thenk you for your affirmation of the evening, and also for your candidness.  I always welcome dialogue, and "free speech". It is clear that you and your daughter are well informed about Russian history.

The comments about the Red Star that night (at Conrad Grebel College) are very important. I remember an audience member telling us that Lithuania recently banned the sale and public display of Soviet paraphanalia.  I also remember the gentleman who asserted that the Red Star represented Marxist ideology, and not Stalin's oppressive political regime in the former USSR.   

However, many more questions about the Red Star need to be asked: Who has the power to define the meaning of the Red Star? Do Marxist ideologists? Or Che Guevara revolutionaries? Or anarchist punk rockers? Or historians?

Or do prisoners of the Gulag camps have the right to define the symbol they saw on official Soviet documents, buildings and military uniforms? Do my grandparents, who shiver in horror when they see the Red Star? Do survivors in Lithunania have the power to determine the meaning of the symbol? 

I welcome your response.

R. Derksen Siemens
Vancouver

Last edited by red (2008-10-30 03:55:23)

#3 2009-06-01 20:47:04

  • Registered: 2009-06-01
  • Posts: 2

Re: Re: Ruth's Presentation in Waterloo - Conrad Grebel - 25 October 2008

The use or misuse of symbols can drive a very complex discussion.  Even Christian symbols have been used in the commission of atrocities, as in the martyrdom of Mennonites and others that the official church and its adherents, such as the Spanish Inquisition, considered herectical.  It is important to use our language to express the precise meanings of such symbols to each and every one of us and not rely on the symbols themselves to speak effectively across the boundaries of experience, culture and generations.  I am very glad that Ruth, her son, Sam and Erinn were able to begin this dialogue by identifying a few of the many meanings embedded in the red star and the swastica.

#4 2009-06-02 05:16:57

  • red
  • New member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2008-08-08
  • Posts: 8

Re: Re: Ruth's Presentation in Waterloo - Conrad Grebel - 25 October 2008

You are right - the meaning of a symbol is not fixed, but changes with the circumstances in which it is used. To punk rockers, the Red Star is cool; to my father it is a horror. Then we must also ask about the hammer and sickle. What does it mean? Who is using it? For what purpose?

Thanks for the dialogue. It is very valuable!

R. Derksen Siemens
Vancouver

#5 2009-10-02 20:56:03

  • Registered: 2009-10-02
  • Posts: 1

Re: Re: Ruth's Presentation in Waterloo - Conrad Grebel - 25 October 2008

Thank you Ruth for providing a forum to this sensitive topic. First it must be made clear to everyone who is coming here to post their thoughts, that education, independent of the status quo is necessary to find truth in what is or will be projected in the future of ancestral children, here or anywhere else on the this topic. Secondly in providing a forum to all who register is perhaps a mistake due to the fact that those individuals who may be directly related to a persecutor has the ability to overthrow the discussion and provide many confusing obstacles by providing their argumentative source as ripe. Thus those who have studied this topic on surface levels are subjected to capitulation and the conspiracy continues on. There are many other reasons for this feeling but it would take pages to provide evidence here.
Anyone who had relatives populating the GULAG system and primarily the Russian German which includes the Mennonites should be the primary objective to access. I do not endorse welcoming a mix of opinions here because of this corruption of information. I can verify my relationship to these historical events by letters during famine periods but for the GULAG system they have probably rotted somewhere or have been destroyed. The point here is that my family originated on the Volga and Krimea and the legitimacy to my opinion is weighed and should be of value.
What I have read here seems to be more on academic opinion and not based on family experience, thus illegitimating the posts. Something also needing to be stated, is that when youth as well as adults have had their minds filled with rubbish for decades, it becomes necessary to explain that those families directly affected by this period of the "Red Terror" have lost all connection to the families from the homeland, and therefore their understanding of this period of evidence has been manipulated in favor of the Bolshevik.
I would certainly like to see the documents of Stalin's order's for the killings, because they will begin or should impact every member of the Russian German community deported into the GULAG, thus identifying once and for all those responsible, to be held accountable to the infinite crimes committed to the community, including other groups.
As for the Red Star it in-fact represents Communism, Bolshevism and Social Democracy and not Marxism specifically but to all of them. For some, it is even suggested that it also represents the Jewish star. This I have yet to confirm, but the leadership is well documented as Jewish or atheistic Jews. This atheism doesn't negate their origin. These are the men responsible for millions of deaths either by famine, execution or the GULAG. So in that regard it is the most appalling symbol against life and has more destruction behind it than the Swastika. Should they be out lawed? I think not as you and I agree that the freedom to discuss this issue is necessary but needs to be moderated with truth. Hearsay is not truth. For individuals to spend a few months on this topic or have seen documentaries on the subject, issues no credibility in their opinion and I support your rigid stance on this issue. The Russian German/German Russian nearly perished through Bolshevism and as it still breathes today, the possibilities of this happening again are possible and disagreement between opinions is witnessed. I would suggest to those learning their heritage to learn about Bolshevism and the arms of security.
To argue among ourselves is destructive to the RG/GR  community and those who argue against the interpretation of the Star are a risk to truth. Most importantly for someone in this debate is a must to analyze their source from whence it came. After 1920 sources can be considered propaganda. The ethnicity is also the most important point in using source information. Question not our ancestor's, Question those who disagree for they wish them all to die! It is for us to Remember them!
Lastly Christianity has existed for nearly 2000 years. Bolshevism/Communism nearly 80 years. Those who suffered told someone about their experience, who congruently told someone and now our children must be told. is the Red Star symbolism right or wrong. The time spent is minuscule in comparison to Christianity. The Star represents the end of a beloved Czarist family and the destruction of Christianity which was accomplished outwardly but not in the hearts and minds of those millions who died by the Iron Fist of the Star. I commend you Ruth for bringing this to the publics attention. I however think since we are not organized as a group we will be once again ridiculed and condemned. We must once again come together and open up communication at all levels. As many wish to reject their cultural identity and cling to a flag as their birth right, it is vital that we all once gain discover our Mother Russia and our Father Germany and unite as their legitimate children once more! Wishing you much success! Krasnov....

Last edited by Krasnov (2009-10-02 21:02:36)

#6 2009-10-20 18:25:58

  • red
  • New member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2008-08-08
  • Posts: 8

Re: Re: Ruth's Presentation in Waterloo - Conrad Grebel - 25 October 2008

You make a very important suggestion Krasnov. On-line posts can be mis-used. You also ask to see  "documents of Stalin's order's for the killings". I do not have these in my possession, but some archivists have found such specific orders. If you send me a specific email (ruth@gulagletters.com) I will provide you with some of this information. However, I do have an NKVD document that lists the causes for which people can be arrested. One of them is having "contacts abroad". This document is included in my book -- Remember Us: Letters from Stalin's Russia.
     Regarding the Red Star -- The questions I pose are: Who has the power to define the symbol? Who is powerless in defining the symbol? What does it mean to the victims? What does it mean to the perpetrator? 

Discussion to be continued ...

R. Derksen Siemens